Some Thoughts on Family Integration

I have a great deal of respect for much of what I have noticed in the Family Integrated Church movement, as I will demonstrate.  However, I also have some issues with some of the practices I have noticed lately.  I just want to take a moment to share my thoughts.

 Background

 As I look back to when I first entered a conservative Southern Baptist Church in the early 90’s, I am troubled by what seemed to be the common practice in those days.  I was very zealous to learn, and fed upon all the teaching that was offered in Sunday School and Discipleship Training as well as the preaching in the morning and evening services.  I really enjoyed learning from the older men in the church in Sunday School discussions.  Unfortunately, the church had a “vision” for a young adult ministry.  As soon as we had a small group of young adults, we were put in our own class.  I longed to gain wisdom from those who had been Christians for years, but instead, I found myself co-teaching a class for those who were my own age.  Of course we did have profitable instruction and conversation, but to this day I am convinced it would have been much better for all of us if we had been allowed to interact with those with much more experience and wisdom.

Another practice that I can’t abide is “Children’s Church”.  Removing the children from the worship service before the preaching of the word is something quite wrong in my opinion.  Just because they might not understand every word is no reason to remove them from sitting under God’s primary means of grace.

I also am a firm proponent and practitioner of home-schooling.  Five of our children have now graduated high school, having been home-schooled the entire way through.  (And their performance in college has proved that their training at home was more than adequate.)  We have one being home-schooled at present and fully intend to do the same with the two who are not yet old enough.  I have always had one primary reason for home-schooling:  1 Cor. 15:33 “Do not be deceived: ‘Evil company corrupts good habits.”  From the time I was converted I could immediately look back at my childhood and recognize the fact that spending most of my waking hours with peers my own age was a great influence upon me in the wrong direction.  I’m sure everyone who home-schools has seen the quotes from the likes of Dewey that demonstrate that one of the purposes of the public school system is to keep children in peer groups in order to lessen the influence that their parents have over them.  I recognize this as a fact and am convinced that my duties as a father demand that I not allow that to happen.

These three factors give me great sympathy for the Family Integrated Church movement.   But I find that I am somewhat troubled by how many churches are now so keen on the idea that they have no age segregation of any kind, as if it would be wrong to ever place children with those at their own learning level together to teach them lessons from the Bible that are particularly suited to them.

 Sunday School

I have noticed that a number of churches have completely removed Sunday School from the church.  I see this as a great detriment.  I agree that the preaching of the word in the worship service is the primary means of teaching.  However, I am also convinced that much is lost by not having a Sunday School as well.  There is a great deal that the people of God ought to be taught, such as systematic theology and church history that quite frankly are not appropriate for sermons.  Teaching through the confession of faith or quality catechisms is a great benefit for Christ’s church as an accompaniment to the faithful exposition of the word.  It is my sincerest belief that Christ’s sheep ought to have such teaching on a regular basis.

I also recognize that we need to understand our children’s frame just as God does ours.  It is indeed a bit much to expect small children to sit through two full hours of teaching on a Sunday morning.  What is wrong with placing them in a class with a godly instructor for the Sunday school hour to learn things at their age level and engage in some activities that make it “fun” for them?  As I stated, I am in full agreement that placing our children among their peers instead of with their parents for the majority of their time is a problem.  But an hour a week learning about the Bible at their own level is not the same thing.  Nor does allowing another person to teach our children remove their parents as the primary responsible parties for their religious education.  Of course the eldership must ensure that they are not being taught unbiblical nonsense, which is unfortunately quite common.  But a godly eldership ought to be quite capable of keeping that from happening.

Nursery

I am also somewhat troubled by the fact that many churches have ceased providing a nursery.  Now by advocating a nursery I am not implicating that all infants must be put there.  As a father of eight, I have used the nursery for some of my children and refrained with others.  I’ve had some children sitting in the church service in a booster chair quite well by the age of one.  I’ve had others that would have been a great distraction to other worshipers as well as their parents had they been kept in the worship service.

Young mothers need a Sabbath too.  They have a 24/7 job that is more hectic than any job a man has.  What a blessing it is for them to have a service provided that allows them to rest from that labor for the worship hour and actually concentrate on the ministry of the word of God without distraction!

Conclusions

Let me just offer my suggestions.  First of all, we ought to have a Sunday School.  A class should be provided for smaller children with a qualified teacher who will teach them at their learning level and provide them with Christ centered activities.  This will not only help keep them from becoming as distracted in the worship service, but also provide teaching for children who may be visiting or come from homes where the father does not fulfill his role as he ought.  If a particular church member is prevented by conscience from putting his kids in the class, they should feel free to keep them in the adult class, and should not be asked not to do so.

I do believe that by the time the children are 10-12, they ought to be in the adult class.  They may not comprehend all that is said, but by that age they ought to be able to follow along for the most part and will definitely benefit from the teaching.

A nursery ought to be provided, but it ought not to be expected that every infant be absent from the worship service.  It is also a great blessing to provide a place for nursing mothers, where they can still hear the sermon without worrying about distracting others, even when their child is being unusually fussy.

 

His Throne is Forever and Ever!

rex

 

Advertisements

4 comments on “Some Thoughts on Family Integration

  1. Thanks Rex for such a balanced perspective. I confess to have been surprised when pastors I have known have told me they were thinking of disbanding Sunday School under the pressure of some FI literature they were given. I would ask whether their SS programs were meeting needs or whether anyone was complaining. I was assured that people were benefitting and folks were happy, yet this new dogma was threatening to upset the good that was being done. I don’t get it. We can surely fix problems without jettisoning things that are good.
    One additional benefit of age segregation is it enables pastors to deal with sensitive topics not approppriate for children.

    Paul

  2. Excellent balance… here is some in-depth interaction/answers to those who would oppose age-segregation of any sort: http://confessingbaptist.com/is-age-segregated-sunday-school-biblical-keith-throop-answers-in-a-3-part-blog/

  3. Kat says:

    I really enjoyed reading your thoughts. As someone who is involved in a “family-integrated” worship setting due to the current logistical needs of the church, and as someone who has previously been involved teaching Sunday School for a church with a nursery and divided SS classes, I can see both sides.

    I think age-divided classes can be great, and can be a fantastic resource for a church seeking to equip all ages to know the Truth. My own kids adored their SS teachers, and enjoyed learning the Catechism and memory verses, just as I did when I was growing up in the Reformed Baptist Church of Grand Rapids. My parents taught Sunday School too!

    And yet, when the situation doesn’t really “work” for separate Sunday School, it’s still possible to make it work for multiple age ranges. Our church has a much less formal Sunday School time in the fellowship hall. The kids can draw and color, eat a donut (the older ladies just love to pass out donuts) or other snack, and ask questions. Currently we are studying the book of Phillipians, but previous topics have included the Nature and Sovereignty of God, church history, etc.

    There is no “nursery” as such, but there is a room in the back with CCTV where families can take a small child who is fussy/needs to nurse, and still see/hear the service. Some of the ladies of the church will often volunteer to sit with young ones, and encourage them to listen, or watch them if Mom needs to go out and change/feed the baby. Caring for and ministering to mothers of young children is definitely important, but I don’t think having a formal nursery is the only way to accomplish that.

    Now, if and when our elders decide to set up a nursery in our congregation, I will be right there signing up to help out! Please don’t think by mentioning alternative ways to offer help to young children that I think the nursery model of ministering to families is invalid, by any means. It only becomes invalid if church policy starts to exclude parents from bringing quiet, non-disruptive infants into the service. I simply wanted to mention that family-integration can be done in a way that takes these things into consideration. 🙂

  4. Titus2Homemaker says:

    I am puzzled by the perceived “need” for a Sunday School (age-segregated or not, actually). Sunday School is a relatively new “invention,” and was created for the purpose of teaching orphaned street children to read. For thousands of years before that, Christians seemed to learn and grow just fine without it. (In many times and places, mid-week meetings weren’t practical, either, so believers only formally came together once a week, for the regular service.)

    If we are falling short somehow merely by removing this one thing, I have to wonder what the REAL problem is that we’re seeing symptoms of.

    Also, I think Kat had some great suggestions. I believe the same thing she does with regard to the nursery, but I would also add that I think there’s a tendency to fall back on the “traditional modern” ways of doing things as a bit of a *crutch*. It’s easier, for instance, to just set up a nursery with an official rotation of workers than to teach our members to watch for ways they can minister to families with little ones (like sitting with them to be an extra set of hands, or offering to be the one to carry them out – which is really “nursery” done naturally rather than formally!).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s